Halo Models and Mock Catalogs
In Skibba et al. (2006), I've developed a halo occupation model that approximately reproduces the luminosity dependence of galaxy clustering (using luminosity-marked correlation functions) and the r-band luminosity function of the SDSS. The model also includes the effects of peculiar velocities and redshift-space distortions, and approximately reproduces the observed redshift-space clustering. I also argued that the "central" galaxies must be treated as special, tending to be the brightest objects in their haloes, while "satellite" galaxies are fainter on average.
In Skibba & Sheth (2009), I developed the first self-consistent model of the (optical) color dependence of galaxy clustering and color-luminosity distribution. (Excellent competing models have appeared in 2013.) In order to reproduce the observed mark clustering measurements (Fig. 6 of this paper is shown below), I argued that satellite galaxies tend to follow a particular path on the CMD, such that brighter satellites are more likely to be on the red sequence and are redder than centrals at a given luminosity.
Here are a description of my amazing halo models (of galaxy clustering and galaxy groups/clusters) and downloadable mock galaxy catalogs.
[I'll add a few more details about this research soon.]
analysis of satellite luminosities in groups (and relating them to subhalo masses) in
Skibba et al. (2007). the satellite luminosity function is nearly independent of group richness. also the ratio M1/Mmin is smaller for galaxy luminosities (approx 15-20) than for DM haloes (~90), with interesting implications.
analysis of central and satellite color distributions in mocks and group catalogs in Skibba (2009). satellite color distributions include a significant blue component, and their color distributions are only weakly dependent on group richness. this implies a star formation quenching mechanism that occurs in all halo masses (rather than being cluster-specific), such as "strangulation/starvation".
analysis of dynamics and spatial distributions of "brightest halo galaxies" in Skibba et al. (2011). we analyze three effects: central galaxy velocity bias, the substructure fraction, and the fraction of systems in which the brightest (or most massive) galaxy isn't the central one. all three are nonzero, but the latter is the dominant effect. the following figure shows how this fraction increases with halo mass and is larger than the fraction in SAMs and our fiducial CLF model.
Models applied to galaxy groups & clusters:
[I’ll add more details about these catalogs soon too. Contact me for more information about them.]
mock catalogs for clustering and environments, groups and clusters, adapting/updating the models described above. (see also Muldrew et al. 2012; Skibba et al. 2013.) the mock box is available here HERE and mock cone is available HERE, both constructed with Millennium simulation haloes using friends-of-friends and SUBFIND halo-finding algorithms. A readme file describing the data in these catalogs will be HERE. Fig. 1 of my 2013 paper is shown, with the luminosity and color-dependent large-scale structure clearly visible.
Mock galaxy catalogs:
and now I’m including effects of dynamical unrelaxedness and anisotropies... effects described in Skibba et al. (2011) and Skibba & Macciò (2011). mock cone is available HERE, constructed with Bolshoi simulation haloes and the Rockstar halo finder. descriptions will be added here, and see also Old et al. (2014) and Knebe et al. (in prep.).
I’m currently working on a new paper (Skibba, in preparation) which will describe my method for constructing mock catalogs and will include all of my new and upcoming updates to the model.
