Lesson 5:
Life's History: The Great Adventure
|
5.3
The Nature of Fossils
|
|
Figure 5.3.1
Mosquito in amber, fossilized
tree resin from the Cretaceous Period
approximately 92 million years old.
|
Among the most intriguing objects on our planet are rocks shaped like organisms.
They are called "fossils" which means "things dug up" in Latin". For example, from
the Jurassic deposits of southern Germany,given time and luck, one can collect an entire
stony zoo of what looks like marine animals. Some of these are readily recognized as
resembling sponges, corals, bivalves (mussels and clams and such),
snails, sea urchins, brittle stars, lamp shells and other types of
creatures commonly found along the sea shore. Others, more rarely
found, look like parts of fishes or reptiles (teeth, vertebrae). Very
lucky collectors have found entire fish, diving reptiles
(ichthyosaurs) and horseshoe crabs, even something that looks like a
cross between a bird and a reptile.
But the most common type of fossil, from the bottom to the top of the sequence,
are coin- to fist-sized spiral-shaped objects resembling a tightly wound ram's
horn. The locals, for centuries, called these objects "shtah shnegli" which
means "stone snails". Geologists call them "ammonites", after the ram's horns
of the Egyptian god Amun, spelled Ammon by the Greeks. (As an aside: the word ammonia
and its derivatives has the same origin: ammonium salts were
originally obtained from horns of sheep and deer.)
|
|
Figure 5.3.2
Ammonite fossil from the late
Jurassic Period, approximately 200 million
years old.
|
Another common fossil is a cigar-shaped item, broken on one end and pointed
on the other, which makes it look like the armed end of a spear. People once referred to
this as a thunder bolt, with a view to the activities of the thunder
god Thor. The "bolts" are commonly seen in ravines along unpaved farm roads throughout
the landscapes of the lower Jurassic, especially after rainstorms when the dust and
dirt has been washed off. The geologists call them "belemnites".
|
|
Figure 5.3.3
Belemnite fossil from the late
Jurassic Period, approximately 200 million
years old.
|
Ammonites and belemnites are now known to be remains of cephalopods, that is, mollusks with
tentacles and a relatively large brain (the largest among
invertebrates). Both ammonites and belemnites are extinct; living
relatives are the chambered Nautilus and the cuttlefish Sepia.
The ornamentation on the ammonite shells changes subtly from one
layer to the next, as one explores the sequence of the Jurassic
deposits, from the black shales at the bottom, through the brown
sandstones in the middle, up to the white limestone layers at the
top. The changes in morphology are recognizable from one quarry to
another, and even all over western Europe.
The subtle differences in the morphology of ammonites, then, allow the stratigraphic
correlation of equivalent layers over long distances. (They do not
allow such correlation into the Jurassic of the Colorado Plateau,
because here we have Navajo Sandstone, which is a deposit made of
dune sand in a terrestrial environment. No marine animals, no
ammonites.)
The nature of fossils as the altered remains of once living organisms is said to have been
recognized by certain Greek philosophers. If so, there was apparently
little effect on Aristotle's thinking. Also, any such insights did
not inform the world view of the leading 16th century naturalists
such as the German mining engineer Georg Bauer "Agricola" (1494-1555) and the Swiss
physician Conrad Gesner (1516-1565), both of whom published on the subject.
Gesner's volume was the first well-illustrated book on fossils. For Gesner and his
contemporaries, fossils were strange objects formed within a vigorous
Earth, delightful and marvelous manifestations of God's creativity,
and with powers worth exploring and putting to use. (Such powers are
ascribed to gems, even today, by popular superstitions, with links to
astrology.)
Only a hundred years later was the close resemblance between certain fossils and living
organisms recognized as demonstrating that there is a causal connection.
The Danish naturalist Nicolaus Steno (aka Niels Stensen, 1636-1686), while working at the
Experimental Academy in Florence, Italy, received an enormous shark's
head for dissection from a catch by local fishermen. He realized the
great similarity of the shark's teeth with the much larger fossils
called "tongue-stones" that he had seen in Denmark. He decided that these fossils,
"Glossopetrae", were the teeth of a super-size shark. Steno published these findings
in 1667.
Two years earlier, the English physicist Robert Hooke (1635-1703) had already drawn
attention to the fact that the fine structures of charcoal and of
fossilized wood, when observed through a microscope, have much in
common, and suggested that buried wood turns to stone through
"petrifying water", that is, precipitation of mineral matter from a solution.
This is today the accepted view.
At the time, both Hooke and Steno were fighting the commonly accepted concept of a vital
force suffusing the Earth and responsible for making fossils within
the rock.. It took till the end of the 17th century to lay that to
rest. In the last years of that century a distinguished naturalist (a
member of the Royal Society), published a treatise on fossils denying
their organic origin. He found it confusing that many fossils had no
known living representative and that they differed from one rock
layer to another. Accepting the views of Hooke and Steno implied that
there had been extinction, and that the world had not been created
perfect. Not a likely scenario in the world view then prevailing.
Once it was understood that fossils represented vanished organisms, they could be used to
reconstruct history. The first history so reconstructed was a Great
Flood (inspired by Biblical testimony) that washed marine organisms
up onto land, where they could turn into fossils. Steno liked the
idea, but he went further. He also suggested that the organic remains
had been deposited within regular horizontal beds, in a normal marine
environment. Thus, their sequence describes the history of life in
the sea. Later, the strata were deformed and up-lifted through
mountain-building processes. This is one reason we find fossils high
up in the mountains.
|